From the Brafferton

College and University

Our Royal Charter decrees that William & Mary “shall be called and denominated, forever, the College of William & Mary in Virginia.” We cherish the Charter. Traditions matter. “College” is very dear to many alumni, especially those who spent their undergraduate years in the shadow of the Wren, frolicking in the Sunken Garden.

But even within its first century, the College also began calling itself a university. There were consistent and deliberate references to William & Mary as a university in the 1700s, as noted in the winter edition of this magazine.

Thomas Jefferson meant to establish William & Mary as a university with his reforms of 1779. As a member of the Board of Visitors, he pressed to add medicine, modern languages and law to W&M’s curriculum. It was the addition of the law school — the first in the country — that turned William & Mary into a university. Only the University of Pennsylvania, with its medical school, contests William & Mary’s claim to being the oldest university in America. Later, Jefferson made explicit his intentions. His autobiography states that he designed William & Mary’s reforms of 1779 “to make it in fact a University.”

We were able last Charter Day to display the honorary degree William & Mary gave Mr. Jefferson in 1783, naming him a doctor in civil law. The diploma, on loan from the Massachusetts Historical Society, showed that William & Mary referred to itself at that time as “the university or college of William & Mary.”

Classified ads in the late 1700s placed by W&M refer to both the “College of” and the “University of.” Many letters from that era refer to William & Mary as a university, including some written by the most distinguished people associated with the school. William & Mary’s President James Madison, in office from 1777 to 1812, often referred to W&M as a university.

So did George Wythe in correspondence with George Washington, who responded likewise, as they discussed whether Washington would need to take over the campus during the Revolutionary War. He ultimately did, turning it into a camp and hospital for American and French soldiers.

In short, there is ample basis in fact and history to call William & Mary either “the College” or “the University,” or, more aptly, both.

These days, outside the United States, “college” is generally understood to mean secondary school or even residence hall. In the United States, “college” is generally understood to mean a school that educates only undergraduates.

Our faculty struggle to convey the stature of William & Mary to their colleagues when they collaborate or lecture overseas. Our admission officers must be sure that international students and their families understand that William & Mary is indeed a distinguished university, not merely a high school or dormitory. Even in Virginia, we are widely recognized as a splendid undergraduate institution, but much less widely thought to be a serious research university. This is damaging, because our schools of law, business, education and marine science, plus graduate programs in arts and sciences, are thriving as part of our university.

Right now, our editorial style guide recommends using “William & Mary” and “the university” for external audiences, and “the College” within the family, especially when speaking to undergraduate alumni. With some frequency, our communications staff has to ask media to correct constructions like “William & Mary College.”

What might we do to better ensure that William & Mary is accurately understood at home and abroad?  One option, of course, would be to formally become the “University of William & Mary” or “William & Mary University,” in the tradition of the other leading colonial colleges, Harvard, Yale, Princeton and Columbia. Were that to happen, it would be essential as well to keep “College” vibrantly alive as the name of our undergraduate program, because “College” has been a cherished part of William & Mary since 1693. This approach has worked well for Harvard and Yale. Interestingly, some prominent universities retain “College” as an official name. It’s still Harvard College, for example, but they do business as Harvard University. Georgetown’s charter recognizes both “College” and “University.”

I have talked to alumni groups far and wide about “what to call William & Mary” for almost as long as I’ve been the 27th president. In my judgment, the Alma Mater of the Nation would benefit quite significantly from calling itself what it actually is — a university — while calling its undergraduate program what it has been since creation, the College. This makes good sense to me. It would work. But I realize the idea needs to take deeper root in our collective thinking than it has to date before any such step might be prudently taken.

It is unlikely there is time for the necessary collective thought during what remains of my time as president. How best to communicate William & Mary’s breadth and depth was important to Jefferson and his peers in the late 1700s, however, and it is even more important in today’s world. We need to give the matter serious thought.


  1. I understand the problems with “college” or “university.”
    However, if the office name is changed to University of William and Mary
    or William and Mary University…the royal charter will be null and void.
    I don’t think that’s what anyone, at least the present administration, wants to see done on their watch.
    What’s wrong with leaving things as they are…Dartmouth College does just fine…as a university.
    Who are we trying to impress….students who seemingly apply to the “College of William and Mary” apparently realize they are going to get a university education. Isn’t that what this is all about. Education.
    Traditions are very, very important to the “College of William and Mary” family. If we’re concerned about our relationship with European universities then let’s say so outright.
    If not, let’s continue as we are.

  2. Were it not for the Royal Charter, President Reveley would have already officially removed the words “College of” from our name. He has already done that successfully in every place he could, except for the diplomas. If you look at the website, nary a “College of” can be found. In addition, those words, along with the Coat of Arms, have been stricken from all the signs. He states that, “our editorial style guide recommends using …the College…especially when speaking to undergraduate alumni”. That sounds to me like undergraduate alumni prefer to keep College of William and Mary as our name. Let us not forget that the reason for our existence is to teach undergraduates. Graduate programs and faculty research are secondary. We should be proud that our faculty wants not only to teach undergraduates but to establish personal relationships (sometimes lifelong) with them. This is seldom possible in large universities where the pressure of research and publishing overshadows teaching of undergraduates. The College of William and Mary should not want to be like them! We should revel in our uniqueness, name and all.

Leave a Reply to Wilford Kale Cancel reply

We welcome feedback and discussion from our readers. All comments are moderated, so your comment may not be published immediately. When commenting, please use your real name and provide your class year. By submitting a comment, you are agreeing that it may be published in the W&M Alumni Magazine along with your name.